Target pest: Solanum mauritianum (Solanales: Solanaceae) = S. auriculatum, woolly nightshade
Agent introduced: Gargaphia decoris (Hemiptera: Tingidae), woolly nightshade lace bug
Brazil via South Africa
Falla et al. (2021) - released individuals were sourced from Brazilian stocks that were established in South Africa after field thermal assessments revealed that they are able to tolerate colder temperatures than the Argentinian stock [that was originally released in South Africa (Cowie et al. 2018)]. [Note that subsequent assessments dismissed this idea, finding that both the original Argentinean and subsequent high-altitude Brazilian stocks could tolerate the low temperatures of South African winters (Cowie et al. 2018).]
Landcare Research (2011) - the first release was made in a forestry block at Tauranga (Bay of Plenty) in 2010. Since then releases have been made in Waikato, Taranaki, Northland and Manawatu-Whanganui.
Landcare Research (2014b) - since first release in 2010, released widely throughout New Zealand.
Landcare Research (2015j) - 9 releases 2014/2015.
Landcare Research (2014b) - established readily at many sites, but predation may limit its potential.
Paynter et al. (2018) - during surveys Sejanus albisignatus [a native mirid bug] observed eating a nymph but predation appears to be relatively trivial.
Falla et al. (2021) - G. decoris has established in the Northland, Auckland, Waikato and the Bay of Plenty regions of the North Island.
Impacts on target:
Landcare Research (2014b) - June 2014 reports of heavy damage to total defoliation under pines in 15-ha area in Ngapeke Forest Block, Bay of Plenty. Evidence here and in South Africa suggests G. decoris does best in partial shade.
Landcare Research (2015i) - some damaging outbreaks are beginning to occur.
Landcare Research (2017g) - beginning to cause significant damage at many sites.
Paynter et al. (2018) - major impacts have been observed on plants in shade or partial shade.
Falla et al. (2021) - the overall damage inflicted to S. mauritianum has been deemed as â€˜trivialâ€™, both in New Zealand and South Africa (where G. decoris has also been released against S. mauritianum), except during sporadic outbreaks. Cowie et al. (2018) attributed the low performance of G. decoris in South Africa to sporadic fluctuations of its population density due to the effect of abiotic and biotic factors such as climate and predation.
Falla et al. (2023) - from glasshouse trials investigating why G. decoris more commonly infests plants growing in shaded locations rather than in full sunlight conditions, it was concluded that light intensity affected physical and chemical traits (including glycoalkaloid concentrations) of S. mauritianum plants and it these effects influenced G. decoris performance. As the host plants grew older, second generation G. decoris females failed to oviposit on low shade plants and displayed smaller bodies compared to the females that developed feeding on high shade plants. Although the key factor behind the differential performance of G. decoris under contrasting light conditions remains unclear, it is believed that plant glycoalkaloid concentrations contribute to host plant selection.
Impacts on non-targets:
Hill (2009) - host range testing conducted in South Africa before lace bug was released there in 1999 showed that G. decoris could not survive or reproduce on plants outside the genus Solanum and showed very strong feeding and oviposition preferences for S. mauritianum. Analysis indicated that, with the possible exception of S. melongena (eggplant), no non-target species were likely to suffer more than incidental damage in the field. New Zealand has three native species of Solanum. Tests conducted in South Africa with these species provided strong evidence that they are not hosts for G. decoris.
Winks (2014) - Solanum mauritianum is the only species likely to be attacked. Host testing showed minor damage to eggplant (Solanum melongena) is possible but has never been reported in the lace bug's native range in South America or introduced range in South Africa.
Paynter et al. (2015) - surveys of potential non-target host S. melongena report no feeding.
EPA (2009b) - 15 Apr 2009: application by Environment Bay of Plenty to import and release from containment the lace bug Gargaphia decoris (Hemiptera, Tingidae) as a biological control agent for the weed woolly nightshade. EPA application # NOR08003, approved without controls 16 Sep 2009.
Cowie BW, Venter N, Witkowski ETF, Byrne MJ, Olckers T. (2018). A review of Solanum mauritianum biocontrol: prospects, promise and problems: a way forward for South Africa and globally. BioControl 63: 475â€“491 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-017-9858-0
EPA (2009b). EPA application NOR08003 to import and release from containment the lace bug Gargaphia decoris (Hemiptera, Tingidae) as a biological control agent for the weed woolly nightshade. Environmental Protection Authority website https://www.epa.govt.nz/database-search/hsno-application-register/view/NOR08003
Falla C, Minor M, Harrington K, Paynter Q, Cordiner S, Najar-Rodriguez A (2023). Effects of light intensity on Solanum mauritianum (Solanaceae) morphological and chemical traits and the performance of its biological control agent Gargaphia decoris (Hemiptera: Tingidae). Biological Control 181, June 2023, 105218 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2023.105218
Falla CM, Avila GA, McColl ST, Minor M, Najar-RodrÃguez AJ. (2021). The current and future potential distribution of Gargaphia decoris: A biological control agent for Solanum mauritianum (Solanaceae). Biological Control, Volume 160, Sept 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104637
Hill R. (2009). Application to EPA (NOR08003) to import and release from containment the lace bug Gargaphia decoris (Hemiptera, Tingidae) as a biological control agent for the weed woolly nightshade. Environmental Protection Authority website https://www.epa.govt.nz/assets/FileAPI/hsno-ar/NOR08003/8bf11bca4d/NOR08003-NOR08003-Final-decision.pdf
Landcare Research (2011). First woolly nightshade bug release. What's new in biological control of weeds 55: 3 http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/20649/wtsnew55.pdf
Landcare Research (2014b). Lace bug does best in shade. What's new in biological control of weeds? 69: 2 http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/publications/newsletters/biological-control-of-weeds/issue-69
Landcare Research (2015i). Who's who in biological control of weeds? Weed Biocontrol: What's New? 73: 10-11 http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/publications/newsletters/biological-control-of-weeds/issue-73
Landcare Research (2015j). Biocontrol agents released in 2014/15. Weed Biocontrol: What's New? 73: 2 http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/publications/newsletters/biological-control-of-weeds/issue-73
Landcare Research (2017g). Who's who in biological control of weeds? Weed Biocontrol: What's New? 81: 10-11 https://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/publications/newsletters/biological-control-of-weeds/issue-81
Paynter Q, Fowler SV, Groenteman R. (2018). Making weed biological control predictable, safer and more effective: perspectives from New Zealand. BioControl 63: 427â€“436 (first published online 8 Aug 2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-017-9837-5 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10526-017-9837-5
Paynter QE, Fowler SV, Gourlay AH, Peterson PG, Smith LA and Winks CJ (2015). Relative performance on test and target plants in laboratory tests predicts the risk of non-target attack in the field for arthropod weed biocontrol agents. Biological Control 80: 133-142 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.10.007
Winks C (2014). Woolly Nightshade Lace Bug. In The Biological Control of Weeds Book (Landcare Research) http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/biocons/weeds/book/documents/Woolly_Nightshade_Lace_Bug.pdf