Gerda data sheet
This page is designed to be printed and given to an expert to allow her to enter or edit the data for a particular incursion response or eradication programme.
Please email the completed form to gerdab3.net.nz
Target species: |
---|
![]() The location within the country (left blank if the infestation is widespread) |
![]() The state, province or territory in the USA, Canada or Australia (blank if the infestation is widespread or another country) |
![]() The country name, as defined in ISO 3116 |
![]() The latitude of the epicentre of infestation, as decimal degrees north of the equator (southern hemisphere locations should have a negative value) |
![]() The longitude of the epicentre of infestation, as decimal degrees north of the equator (western locations should have a negative value) |
![]() The Koppen climate group(s) of the infested zone |
![]() The date on which the incursion was detected |
![]() The date on which the detection was reported to the appropriate authorities |
![]() A classification of the person who made the detection, as in Froud et al. (2008) pp. 97-110 in Surveillance for Biosecurity: Pre-Border to Pest Management ISBN 978-0-473-14188-2 |
![]() The specific surveillance method by which the incursion was first detected |
![]() Any further information relevant to detection of this incursion |
![]() The name of the official agency charged with conducting this investigation |
![]() The probable mode of introduction and any evidence for this |
![]() Details of how the geographical extent of the infestation was measured |
![]() How well established the invading population was when discovered |
![]() The area occupied by the infestation, in hectares. Enter 0 if no ground population was found |
![]() The types of environments occupied by the infestation |
![]() The criterion on which the hazard posed by this taxon was judged |
![]() The name of the official agency that made the decision on how to respond to this incursion |
![]() The management decision resulting from the incursion investigation |
![]() The reasons why eradication was not attempted, if that was the case |
![]() Any other relevant information on the incursion investigation |
![]() The operational start date of the eradication response |
![]() The operational end date of the eradication response |
![]() The date at which eradication was officially declared (if successful) |
![]() The name of the official agency charged with conducting the eradication |
![]() The area (in hectares) of the quarantine zone imposed around the infestation, or 0 if no movement control was imposed |
![]() The maximum extent (in hectares) of eradication treatments, excluding quarantine and surveillance |
![]() Details of how progress towards eradication was monitored |
![]() The currency amount spent on the eradication programme |
![]() The specific currency (ISO 4217) of the amount entered above |
![]() The year in which the above cost was calculated (so that the costs of eradication programmes can be compared over historical time) |
![]() Details of how costs were shared between government and industry |
![]() The outcome at the end of the eradication programme |
![]() Evidence for the outcome stated above |
![]() Probable reasons for the eradication failing (if it did) |
![]() Any other relevant information |
![]() Enter details of control tools used: · pesticide/antibiotic · biopesticide · bait spray · lure and kill · mass trapping · mating disruption · sterile insect technique · host removal/destruction · removal by hand · quarantine/movement control · natural enemies · tissue culture and replacement · temperature therapy · other |